Selasa, 21 Juni 2016
PSIKOLINGUISTICS
sebelum membahas tentang psikolinguistics, perhatikan
berikut ini :
1. Mengapa memilih Psikolinguistics ?
Karena, Psikolinguistics merupakan satu teori
pembelajaran (menurut teori behaviorisme) berdasarkan bahasa yang dianggap
sebagai satu system tabiat dan kemampuan kemampuan yang menghubungkan isyarat
dengan perilaku.
2. Apa Psikolinguistics ?
Von
Humboldt (1767-1835), pakar linguistik berkebangsaan Jerman, telah mencoba
mengkaji hubungan antara bahasa dengan pemikiran manusia. Caranya dengan
membandingkan tata bahasa dari bahasa-bahasa yang berlainan dengan
tabiat-tabiat bangsa-bangsa penutur bahasa itu. Ferdinand de Saussure (1858-1913), pakar linguistik
berkebangsaan Swiss, Beliau memperkenalkan tiga istilah tentang bahasa yaitu
langage (bahasa umumnya bersifat abstrak), Langue (bahasa tertentu yang
bersifat abstrak), parole (bahasa sebagai tuturan konkret).
Dari berbagai sumber mengenai keterkaitan
Psikologi dalam linguistik dapat di simpulkan bahwa dalam
pembelajaran bahasa atau linguistik ini pasti membutuhkan psikologi atau
kejiwaan dan bakat yang dimiliki masing-masing Individu yang saling berkaitan.
Dalam bahasa manusia memiliki Language
Acquisition Device (LAD) untuk
melakukan kegiatan berbahasa dalam kehidupan sehari-hari.
3. Apa yang dipilih dari Linguistics Murni ?
In linguistics, it is the study of interpretation of
signs or symbols used in the institution or the community in specific
circumstances and context. In this view, voice, facial expressions, body
language, and proxemics have content semantics (meaning), and each of which
consists of several branches of study. In written language, things like the
structure of paragraphs and punctuation bear semantic content, other forms of
language bore other semantic content.
A. HISTORY OF BIRTH Psycholinguistics
1. In Linguistics Psychology
Von
Humboldt (1767-1835), German linguist, has tried to examine the relationship
between languages with human thinking. You do this by comparing the grammar
of different languages with the traits of nations speaking it. Ferdinand de
Saussure (1858-1913), linguist Swiss nationality, he introduced the three terms
of the language that is langage (language usually abstract), Langue (specific
language that is abstract), parole (language as a concrete utterance).
From various sources on the association of
Psychology in linguistics can be concluded that in learning languages or
linguistics is definitely in need of psychological or psychiatric and talents
of each individual interrelated. In human language has a Language Acquisition
Device (LAD) to conduct a language in everyday life.
2. Linguistics in Psychology
John Dewey (1859-1952), an American psychologist, a
pure empiricism. He said grade assessment based on understanding childhood we
can determine the tendency of mind (mental) childhood is associated with
linguistic differences. Such assessment is, according to Dewey will provide
great assistance to the language of psychology in general. Karl Buchler,
berkebanngsaan German linguist, in his book Theorie Sprach (1934), he stated
that the language of human being has three function called Kungabe (then called
Ausdruck) Appell (previously called Auslosung), and Darstellung. What is meant
by Kungabe adalh communicative action that is realized in verbal form. Appell
is a request addressed to someone else. While darstellung is a depiction of
subject matter that is communicated.
Weiss one prominent a figure psikolingustik
behaviorism which has paved the way towards the birth of the discipline
psikolinggustik. Weiss also been pulled, ukakan a number of problems to be
solved by linggustik and psychology from the point of behaviorism. Among those
problems are as follows:
1) Language is a set of responses that amount is not
limited to a stimulus.
2) Basically the behavior of language unites members of a community into the organization of the nervous motion.
2) Basically the behavior of language unites members of a community into the organization of the nervous motion.
3) Conduct a language is a tool to transform and
diversify tingle one's activities as a result of inheritance and acquisition
results.
4) The language can be a stimulus to a response, or is
one responsterhadap a stimulus.
5) language as a stimulus response substitute for
objects and circumstances that actually allows us to bring back something that
breathing occurs, and analyze this event in its parts.
3. Cooperation Psychology and Linguistics
Chaer (in Rose, 2012) says that the direct cooperation
between the disciplines of psychology and linguistics started since 1860. That
is by Heyman Steinthal, a psychologist who turned linguist, and Moria Lazarus a
linguist-turned psychologists to publish a journal devoted specifically to talk
about the psychology of language from the point
linguistics and psychology.
linguistics and psychology.
According to Steinthal, a psychological science may
not be able to live without a knowledge of languages. He also said that the
only way to get into the mind of man is through the laws of the origin of
language and not through human senses. This cooperation is more closely
conducted in 1901 in Germany by Albert Thumb a linguist with Karl Marbe a
psychologist as a result of his cooperation. Specifically Thumb and Marbe has
conducted in-depth study of the language by means of cooperation between the
linguistic analysis of the analogy with a psychological analysis of the
relationship of substitutions language.
Fundamentals of psycholinguistics, according to some experts, in a book edited by Osgood and Sebeok above are as follows:
Fundamentals of psycholinguistics, according to some experts, in a book edited by Osgood and Sebeok above are as follows:
1) Psycholinguistics is a linguistic theory based on
the language considered as a system of interconnected elements.
2) Psycholinguistics is a learning theory (the theory
of behaviorism) based on the language are regarded as one system character and
the capability of connecting with behavioral cues.
3) Psycholinguistics is an information theory that
considers language as a tool to convey an object.
4. Psikolingustik As Self Discipline
Formally psikolingustik birth marked by the opening of
the special program psikolingustik in 1953 by R. Brown. Sarjanah first (Ph.D.)
generated by this program is Eric Lenneberg, which is very much its role in the
field of psikolingustik.
Prior to the publication of two books were very
important in the development psikilingustik, namely Verbal Behavior (1957) by
Skinner and book Syantactic Structures (1957) by Noam Chomsky, Leshley has
suggested the existence of several problems that can be solved together by
experts psikoligi and linguistic experts. In Leshley theory states that the
birth of an utterance is not a response to a spate ties that come from outside,
but is a reasonable simultaneous events, and the speech was merely syntactic
structures is not directly linked to the order form.
In that case Lenneberg states that humans possessed
biological kecebderungan specifically to acquire a language that is not owned
animals, the reason is sebahai follows:
1) The presence of typical centers in the brain for
language.
2) Method of language development in all infants are
the same.
3) The difficulty is experienced to inhibit the growth of human language
4) All the languages in the world have the same parts that are universal
3) The difficulty is experienced to inhibit the growth of human language
4) All the languages in the world have the same parts that are universal
5. Three Generations In Psikolingustik
a. Psikolingustik First Generation
Psikolingustik first generation is
psikolingustik with pera experts who wrote the article in a collection of
essays entitled Psycholingustics. Theories of behaviorism's behavior or
language identified as a response system that directly and indirectly to the
stimulus erbal and nonverbal. Orientation is the stimulus-response psychology
orientation.
Regarding this first generation psikolingustik theory,
Perera (1996) noted that there are three weaknesses, as follows:
1) The reactive nature of psikolingustik about
language.
2) The first Psikolingustik is otomistik.
3) Psikolingustik This first generation is
indiidualis.
Their three inimemang weaknesses can not be denied.
However, these theories can psikolingustik Oggood and Sebeok are acceptable as
a mediator between the theory of behavioral theories (behaviorism) and
cognitive theory.
b. Psikolingustik Second Generation
According to Mahler and Noizet, psikilingustik second
generation has been able to overcome the atomistic characteristics of
psikolingustik Osgood-Sobeok. Psikolingustik second generation found in the
process of language is not the language grains obtained, but Kaida and systems
kaidalah obtained.
Leontive a psycholinguists Russia believes there
are several characteristics psikolingustik first generation, which should be
avoided even still looked and continue. According to the second generation
reaction Leontive attitude not seen in Chomky and Miller although their
interpretations of the verbal structure is more complex. In addition, the
characteristics of individualism is still visible without criticism. In fact,
this individualism characteristic seems to be protected because of social roles
and social environment increases to actualize rules inherited universal
language.
c. Psikolingustik Third Generation
Psikolingustik second generation stated that
their analysis of language has exceeded the limit of the sentence. However, the
reality of their analysis is limited to the analysis of the relationship
between the sentence and the sentence, has not reached the discourse.
Some of the concepts related to the analysis of the topics have been introduced, but still no sequel. Psycholinguists second generation also drew a parallel between the linguistic and mental processes of cognitive psychology. The level of linguistic and cognitive psychology level design processes that parallel can be seen in the following chart.
linguistic subsystems
Some of the concepts related to the analysis of the topics have been introduced, but still no sequel. Psycholinguists second generation also drew a parallel between the linguistic and mental processes of cognitive psychology. The level of linguistic and cognitive psychology level design processes that parallel can be seen in the following chart.
linguistic subsystems
Level design Psikolingustik
a) Analysis of discourse
b)
Draft discourse
c) Draft intonation
d)
Syntax sentence
e) Draft syntax
f) lexical rules
g) The draft election lexical
h)
Rule Morphophonemic
i) Draft Morphophonemic
j) Rule phonology
k)
The design of phonemic and motor.
This necessity gave birth psikolingustik by G. Werstch the third generation in his book Two Problems for the New Psycholinguistics named New Psycholinguistics or new psikolingustik. The characteristics of third generation psikolingustik are as follows:
1) First, their orientation to psychology, behavioral
psychology tetepi not
2) Second, their disengagement from karangka
"psikolingustik phrase" and involvement in psikolingustik that based
on the situation and context
3) Third, there is a shift from the analysis of the
speech that abstract unity psychological analysis of the communications and
conjecture.
B. RELATIONSHIP LANGUAGE THINK and cultured
B. RELATIONSHIP LANGUAGE THINK and cultured
1. Theory wilhelm Von Humbolot
wilhelm Von Humbolot, scholars Jerma abab 19th
emphasize their dependence on the language of human thought, maksutnya
worldview of a culture, a society is determined by the language of the
community itself.
Von Humbolot found the substance of the language itself consists of two parts, the first part of the sounds and the second part is the thoughts that have not yet formed.
Von Humbolot found the substance of the language itself consists of two parts, the first part of the sounds and the second part is the thoughts that have not yet formed.
From the description above that language is the
outward form, while the mind is in the form, the outward form language that we
hear, whereas in the form resides in the brain.
2. The theory of Sapir-Whorf
Edward (1884-1938) American linguist says that human
beings live in this world under the "twelve cation" language that has
become a tool of instruction in public life, according to Sapir, has been the
fact that the life of a community most "established" beyond tabiat-
character and plumb-plumb the language, that's why no two the same language so
that it can be considered have a same society.
Benjamin Lee Whorf (1897-1941) rejected the classical
view of the relationship of language and thought which says that language and
thought are two things that stand-alone sediri, the classical view that says
even though every language has sounds different, but all of them said rumusa same-formulation
is based on the same thinking and observation.
According to Whorf, grammatical system of a language even just a tool to express ideas, but also the formation of ideas, it is a person's mental activity program, deciding a person's mental structure. In other words, the word language that shape the way a person's mind (Simanjuntak, 1987).
According to Whorf, grammatical system of a language even just a tool to express ideas, but also the formation of ideas, it is a person's mental activity program, deciding a person's mental structure. In other words, the word language that shape the way a person's mind (Simanjuntak, 1987).
3. Theory of Jean Piaget
Piaget French scholars argue it is the mind that form
the language, without thought language would not exist, pemikiranlah decisive
aspects of syntactic and lexical language, even the opposite.
Regarding the relationship with the activities of the
intellect (mind) Piaget suggests two important things, namely:
1) Source of intellectual activity there is in
language, developed sensomotorik, namely a scheme, the descriptions of the
aspects sruktur factions, and relationships, objects, and forms the basis of
irregularities and operation pemakayan back.
2) Establishment of the ideas put forward and shaped
at the same time with language acquisition. Both mamiliki more general
processes, namely the constitution fingsi emblem in general, funhsi emblem is
characterized by a wide range of behaviors that occur simultaneously in its
development.
4. Theory Vygotsky L.S
Vygotsky scholar Russian nation, believes there is one
stage of language development before their minds, and their minds a stage prior
to their language
In studying the movement of the mind is emotion
investigate the two parts of speech, the speech in which menpunyai sense, which
is the phonetic or aspect sapek-speech sounds.
5. The theory of Noam Chomsky
Relations of language and thought Chomsky resubmit the
classical theory called conscience Chomsky hypothesis asserts that the study of
language opens good perspectives in penkajian mental processes (thinking) man.
Hypothesis conscience say that the structure of the
language is the conscience, which means that under the formula from birth.
Hypothesis conscience found structures in the language is the same.
6. Theory Eric Lenneberg
The relationship of language and thought, Eric
proposed a theory called the theory of a special language skills. Menuru Eric
ample evidence to show that people receive the original biological heritage of
the ability to communicate in a language that is specific to human and has
nothing to do with intelligence and reasoning
7. Theory of Bruner
Relationships language and thought Bruner introduced a
theory called the theory intrumentalisme, according to this theory of human
language is a tool for developing and refining the idea.
Bruner argues that language and thought develops from
the same source, further language and thought appliance into force of the
action, besides that there are two skills that involve language, namely skills
linggustik and communications skills, da Bruner also introduce their skills
analysis possessed by every human being who speak ,
8. Kekontroversian Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
a. theory Hypotheses
1) Von Humboldt said that their view of life are
manifold because of the diversity of language systems and their universal
systems owned by the languages in the world.
2) Sapir-Whorf says that the structure of language
determines the structure of the mind.
3) Piaget said that the structure of thought formed by
behavior, not by the structure of the language.
4) Vygotsky said that in the beginning of language and
mind developed sendiru-alone and do not affect each other.
5) Chomsky mengataka that language and thought are two
systems apart has keotomiannya respectively
6) Lenneberg say that humans have already received an
inheritance of biology at birth
7) Bruner said that language is a tool for people to
think, to enhance and develop pemikirab it.
Among the theories or hypothesis, Sapir-Whorf
hypothesis is the most controversial, this hypothesis says that the way the
mind and one's culture or society is determined or influenced by the structure
of the language. Raises many criticisms and reactions of the philosophers,
linggistik, psychology, psikolinggustik, anthropology and etc.
LEXICOLOGY
Understanding Lexicology - Lexicology in English is
called lexicology, the science / studies on the shape, the history and the
meaning of words. Meanwhile, in Arabic, lexicology called the Um Al-Ma'ajim,
namely the study of the ins and outs of the dictionary. According iltilah,
lexicology is the science that studies the ins and outs of the meaning /
significance vocabulary contained or to be contained in the dictionary. In
addition to the term lexicology and ilm al-Ma'ajim, there are also some other
terms used to describe the science of dictionaries. For example, Ilm Al-alfadz,
Al-Laffadzah, Ilm dalalah Mu'jamiyah and so on.
While lexicography (Dirasah Mu'jamiyah) is a science
and art of crafting dictionaries by using systematics certain to produce a
quality product dictionary, easy and complete.
Between lexicology and lexicography are inseparable.
Lexicology without lexicography, will not produce a good product dictionary,
correct and easily utilized by users of the language. Instead, lexicography
without leksikologim also can only give birth dictionaries imperfect in
expressing the meaning of the vocabulary. However, the science of lexicography
as part of applied linguistics, more require the results of the study or the
study of science lexicology in efforts to achieve a good dictionary, correct,
complete and allows the reader. Therefore, the term 'science lexicology' more
common than 'science of lexicography'. Mentioned 'lexicology' means relating
and includes 'lexicography'.
Technically, Ali Al-Qasimy explained that lexicography
is the science which deals with five main steps in preparing a dictionary,
namely:
1. Collecting data (vocabulary)
2. Selecting the approach and method of preparation of
the dictionary will be pursued
3. Compile a word in accordance with certain
systematics
4. Writing materials, and
5. Publicize the codification of the language or the
dictionary
Thus, both the science and the science of lexicography
lexicology, both part dariilmu linguistics. lexicology, as the study of the
development of semantics, become part of the science of theoretical linguistics
(Ilm Al-lughah Al-Nadzary). While lexicography, as the study of the development
of lexicology, being part of applied linguistics (Ilm Al-lughah Al-Tathbiqy).
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)